<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 394justice's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://394justice.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cyber Terrorists by Sher</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/cyber-terrorists/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Sher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://394justice.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Just a few quick comments on your presentation.  Good job by the way, I would have liked to see some more of the viral videos you linked, but you explained the premise of the final paper well.  I think your comparison of the viral video as a political campaigning tool to the tools used in previous elections (Tv, radio etc.) is a really important part of your paper and what you seem to be saying about the importance of viral videos.  I would also integrate a discussion about the role of viral politics and the major distinction between these forms of campaigning.  I really liked the point you brought up about the back and forth nature of  viral videos - they aren&#039;t just static like TV or radio and therefore can&#039;t be controlled only by the candidates.  People can post video responses, or make spoof videos like John.he.is etc.  Good start to this paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few quick comments on your presentation.  Good job by the way, I would have liked to see some more of the viral videos you linked, but you explained the premise of the final paper well.  I think your comparison of the viral video as a political campaigning tool to the tools used in previous elections (Tv, radio etc.) is a really important part of your paper and what you seem to be saying about the importance of viral videos.  I would also integrate a discussion about the role of viral politics and the major distinction between these forms of campaigning.  I really liked the point you brought up about the back and forth nature of  viral videos &#8211; they aren&#8217;t just static like TV or radio and therefore can&#8217;t be controlled only by the candidates.  People can post video responses, or make spoof videos like John.he.is etc.  Good start to this paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viral Marketing and Viral Politics by mlim</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/02/22/identity-theft-viral-marketing-and-viral-politics/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>mlim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://394justice.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d suggest to just drop the identity theft and just focus on the viral videos and political campaigns. viral marketing could be mentioned, but it shouldn&#039;t be your focus at all. 

item IIB isn&#039;t necessary. it&#039;s a research paper, you don&#039;t need to come up with a set of instruction on &quot;how-to&quot; gain recognition or spread messages. focus on IIC -- analysis, start digging on good methods of collecting and analyzing data. 

overall, good job. could potentially  be a very interesting paper. 

-merlyna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suggest to just drop the identity theft and just focus on the viral videos and political campaigns. viral marketing could be mentioned, but it shouldn&#8217;t be your focus at all. </p>
<p>item IIB isn&#8217;t necessary. it&#8217;s a research paper, you don&#8217;t need to come up with a set of instruction on &#8220;how-to&#8221; gain recognition or spread messages. focus on IIC &#8212; analysis, start digging on good methods of collecting and analyzing data. </p>
<p>overall, good job. could potentially  be a very interesting paper. </p>
<p>-merlyna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viral Marketing and Viral Politics by Sher</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/02/22/identity-theft-viral-marketing-and-viral-politics/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Sher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://394justice.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Great start for your paper.  Starting with the examples you plan to analyze for the paper gave me a really good indication of the direction you wish to take with the paper.  I have a few suggestions in terms of organization. It reads to me like you have the beginnings of what might be two different paper topics.  On the one hand, you have the issue with viral marketing and videos and identity theft via e-mail, malicious links etc.  Then on the other hand, you talk about viral videos and their impacts within political campaigns.  I think you might want to pick one topic (either viral videos and political campaigns,  or viral marketing and identity theft) as these seem to be more separate issues and I can&#039;t really detect the connection between the two.  It seems like both would be good directions to go in, but you seem to have written more (here and in other blog postings) about the viral video impacts.  You could possibly do an analysis of the different political viral videos, and talk about the debates around them.  You could focus on all the presidential candidates, or pick a party.  Comparing and contrasting the responses and methods of distribution of the videos (YesWeCan, Hot4Hill, RonPaul Revolution, etc.) might be yet another way to go with these topics.  Overall, you have a very good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great start for your paper.  Starting with the examples you plan to analyze for the paper gave me a really good indication of the direction you wish to take with the paper.  I have a few suggestions in terms of organization. It reads to me like you have the beginnings of what might be two different paper topics.  On the one hand, you have the issue with viral marketing and videos and identity theft via e-mail, malicious links etc.  Then on the other hand, you talk about viral videos and their impacts within political campaigns.  I think you might want to pick one topic (either viral videos and political campaigns,  or viral marketing and identity theft) as these seem to be more separate issues and I can&#8217;t really detect the connection between the two.  It seems like both would be good directions to go in, but you seem to have written more (here and in other blog postings) about the viral video impacts.  You could possibly do an analysis of the different political viral videos, and talk about the debates around them.  You could focus on all the presidential candidates, or pick a party.  Comparing and contrasting the responses and methods of distribution of the videos (YesWeCan, Hot4Hill, RonPaul Revolution, etc.) might be yet another way to go with these topics.  Overall, you have a very good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Politics by jus394spthaghost</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/internet-politics/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>jus394spthaghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/internet-politics/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I totally agree the internet is a place where people can reach anyone who is connected.  To be honest I receive emails sometimes which I find informative and very interesting.  The knowledge that I acquire from anonymous or spam mail is good sometimes but there are on a number of occaisons times when I get information that I don&#039;t want.  The internet can be weapon against the government from the people, but it also can be weapon against people by people a good example is this.  What if I don&#039;t want receive emails, or have popups show on my computer?  Is privacy or the right to enjoy the internet free of others invasion needed?  Good post you got me thinking about the whole use of the internet as weapon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree the internet is a place where people can reach anyone who is connected.  To be honest I receive emails sometimes which I find informative and very interesting.  The knowledge that I acquire from anonymous or spam mail is good sometimes but there are on a number of occaisons times when I get information that I don&#8217;t want.  The internet can be weapon against the government from the people, but it also can be weapon against people by people a good example is this.  What if I don&#8217;t want receive emails, or have popups show on my computer?  Is privacy or the right to enjoy the internet free of others invasion needed?  Good post you got me thinking about the whole use of the internet as weapon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benefits of the Internet by Sher</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/01/27/benefits-of-the-internet/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Sher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://394justice.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Great comment and post.  Quick follow-up question:  Is it possible to just take the good of the internet, so to speak? Take the example of spam in e-mail, or pop-up advertisements, and internet banners on web pages.  Even with filter, anti-spy ware, and phishing filters, identity theft, pornographic content and other questionable material arrive on computers.  Also, going back to the lectures on the politics of the internet and technology, what questions can be raised when we think about politics of the internet?  Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment and post.  Quick follow-up question:  Is it possible to just take the good of the internet, so to speak? Take the example of spam in e-mail, or pop-up advertisements, and internet banners on web pages.  Even with filter, anti-spy ware, and phishing filters, identity theft, pornographic content and other questionable material arrive on computers.  Also, going back to the lectures on the politics of the internet and technology, what questions can be raised when we think about politics of the internet?  Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My First Post by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://394justice.wordpress.com/2008/01/17/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#039; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
